<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>TPOV &#187; Windows Server 2003</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tino.nl/index.php/category/windows/windows-server-2003/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tino.nl</link>
	<description>Tino&#039;s Point Of View - I intend to live forever. So far, so good.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 21:34:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Exchange 2010; Standard or Enterprise? DAG Alternatives?</title>
		<link>http://www.tino.nl/index.php/2009/10/10/exchange-2010-standard-or-enterprise-dag-alternatives/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tino.nl/index.php/2009/10/10/exchange-2010-standard-or-enterprise-dag-alternatives/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 16:48:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tino</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Exchange & OCS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Server 2003]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DAG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enterprise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exchange 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standard]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tino.nl/index.php/2009/10/10/exchange-2010-standard-or-enterprise-dag-alternatives/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ever since the first betas of Exchange 2010, one of the most discussed features is the Database Availability Group; DAG. Without going into all the details of DAG, it truely is huge step forward in Exchange High-Availablility, primairily because it’s so very, very easy to configure. Exchange 2010 comes, just like previous versions, in two [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tino.nl/index.php/2009/10/10/exchange-2010-standard-or-enterprise-dag-alternatives/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HOW TO: Use a Custom Membership Provider, Custom Membership User and Role-Provider with a WCF Service hosted inside a Windows Service.</title>
		<link>http://www.tino.nl/index.php/2009/08/14/how-to-use-a-custom-membership-provider-custom-membership-user-and-role-provider-with-a-wcf-service-hosted-inside-a-windows-service/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tino.nl/index.php/2009/08/14/how-to-use-a-custom-membership-provider-custom-membership-user-and-role-provider-with-a-wcf-service-hosted-inside-a-windows-service/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 11:19:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tino</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Server 2003]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Server 2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows XP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C#]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Membership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Provider]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Visual Studio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WCF]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tino.nl/index.php/2009/08/14/how-to-use-a-custom-membership-provider-custom-membership-user-and-role-provider-with-a-wcf-service-hosted-inside-a-windows-service/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have written a small HOW TO on how to use a Customer Membership Provider, a Custom Role-Provider and a Custom Membership User for username/password authentication in a WCF Service that is hosted in a Windows Service. The HOW TO includes a sample implementation of these providers. It also includes a complete Visual Studio Project [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tino.nl/index.php/2009/08/14/how-to-use-a-custom-membership-provider-custom-membership-user-and-role-provider-with-a-wcf-service-hosted-inside-a-windows-service/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Passive FTP on Windows Server 2003 with Windows Firewall.</title>
		<link>http://www.tino.nl/index.php/2008/12/19/passive-ftp-on-windows-server-2003-with-windows-firewall/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tino.nl/index.php/2008/12/19/passive-ftp-on-windows-server-2003-with-windows-firewall/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 18:05:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tino</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Windows Server 2003]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firewall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Passive FTP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tino.nl/index.php/2008/12/19/passive-ftp-on-windows-server-2003-with-windows-firewall/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s on the net everywhere&#8230; But I still get a lot of questions on how to enable Passive FTP on a Windows Server 2003 machine with Windows Firewall enabled. Without further adue.. C:\Inetpub\AdminScripts\adsutil.vbs set /MSFTPSVC/PassivePortRange &#8220;5500-5700&#8243; FOR /L %I IN (5500,1,5700) DO netsh firewall add portopening TCP %I &#8220;Passive FTP Port &#8220;%I]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tino.nl/index.php/2008/12/19/passive-ftp-on-windows-server-2003-with-windows-firewall/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Publishing an ASP.NET site that uses Membership components.</title>
		<link>http://www.tino.nl/index.php/2008/06/17/publishing-an-aspnet-site-that-uses-membership-components/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tino.nl/index.php/2008/06/17/publishing-an-aspnet-site-that-uses-membership-components/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 08:25:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tino</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Server 2003]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASP.NET]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Membership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Visual Studio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tino.nl/?p=28</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There appears to be a bug in the publishing of ASP.NET sites that use Membership components to a remote web server. If you create a new Visual Studio 2008 ASP.NET project that uses Membership components, and use the ASP.NET Web Site Administration Tool to secure access to folders within the project, these permissions are, by [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tino.nl/index.php/2008/06/17/publishing-an-aspnet-site-that-uses-membership-components/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>32bit Stuff on 64bit Windows Server 2003</title>
		<link>http://www.tino.nl/index.php/2008/03/13/32bit-stuff-on-64bit-windows-server-2003/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tino.nl/index.php/2008/03/13/32bit-stuff-on-64bit-windows-server-2003/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 08:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tino</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Windows Server 2003]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[32-bit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[64-bit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frontpage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tino.nl/index.php/2008/03/13/32bit-stuff-on-64bit-windows-server-2003/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It must have been answered a thousand times, and it must have caused confusion, annoyance and inconvenience far more then a million times. Needless to say I ran into the same problems when I started migration 32bit servers to their 64bit equivalent. I ran into problems not only with regards to IIS6, but also using [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tino.nl/index.php/2008/03/13/32bit-stuff-on-64bit-windows-server-2003/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

